My GTM thinking developed across different contexts: early-career years on the product and commercial launches track (Vodafone), projects within global B2B organisations (Danfoss), and a current focus on early-stage companies.

Tried, trusted, good sense:
Segmentation unlocks persona, persona unlocks positioning, positioning unlocks execution. The right sequence makes the difference between activity and traction.
Segment before you position, then score each candidate against urgency, reachability, and where you already win unprompted. A vague ICP produces generic positioning that resonates with no one.
Fix the leak before filling the bucket. Diagnose where the system is failing before deciding what to build. Acquisition spend has a low ceiling when onboarding or retention is broken.
Positioning is internal strategy, built in the customer's language. Lock it before any channel or content decision is made.
Claims need proof. The strongest differentiators are built from evidence that already exists — in deal notes, customer interviews, and usage data.
Channel follows motion. Define the buying motion first — PLG, sales-led, or hybrid — then choose where to show up. Concentrate on two channels with full resource before adding more, and treat the others as 90-day experiments: cut what doesn't perform, double what does.
Automate the repeatable, not the strategic. GTM tooling now covers prospect enrichment, outbound sequencing, lead routing, and signal syncing across platforms. This is where teams reclaim time. The strategic work — ICP definition, positioning, message design — cannot be automated. At least, not yet.